<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XML and the Natural Language Toolkit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openshakespeare.org/2010/02/26/xml-and-the-natural-language-toolkit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openshakespeare.org/2010/02/26/xml-and-the-natural-language-toolkit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adalovelace</title>
		<link>http://www.openshakespeare.org/2010/02/26/xml-and-the-natural-language-toolkit/comment-page-1/#comment-8215</link>
		<dc:creator>adalovelace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openshakespeare.org/?p=76#comment-8215</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ingrid: the answer is very simple:
I just counted the &#039;!&#039;s and &#039;?&#039;s per character, and MacDuff may not talk much, but when he does is with exclamation signs... where Macbeth is less prone to use them.
I haven&#039;t parsed the ratio of them per word... that is a good idea  for next graphs!
The nltk scripts I&#039;ve used are in the contrib folder on the project sourcecode: http://knowledgeforge.net/shakespeare/hg/log?rev=nltk&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the idea Ingrid, I will see which other numbers I can infer...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ingrid: the answer is very simple:<br />
I just counted the &#8216;!&#8217;s and &#8216;?&#8217;s per character, and MacDuff may not talk much, but when he does is with exclamation signs&#8230; where Macbeth is less prone to use them.<br />
I haven&#8217;t parsed the ratio of them per word&#8230; that is a good idea  for next graphs!<br />
The nltk scripts I&#8217;ve used are in the contrib folder on the project sourcecode: <a href="http://knowledgeforge.net/shakespeare/hg/log?rev=nltk" rel="nofollow">http://knowledgeforge.net/shakespeare/hg/log?rev=nltk</a></p>
<p>Thanks for the idea Ingrid, I will see which other numbers I can infer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrid</title>
		<link>http://www.openshakespeare.org/2010/02/26/xml-and-the-natural-language-toolkit/comment-page-1/#comment-8207</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openshakespeare.org/?p=76#comment-8207</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the graphs - they are very interesting!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m curious, in the first graph on exclamations and interrogations, MacBeth has shorter bars than, say MacDuff despite having more lines, so I&#039;m guessing you normalised in some way.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Did you look at the ratio of the number of &#039;!&#039;/&#039;?&#039; characters in a character&#039;s speech to the number of words, lines or complete sentences spoken by the character - or did you do something else entirely?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Many thanks again!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>Thanks for the graphs &#8211; they are very interesting!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious, in the first graph on exclamations and interrogations, MacBeth has shorter bars than, say MacDuff despite having more lines, so I&#8217;m guessing you normalised in some way.  </p>
<p>Did you look at the ratio of the number of &#8216;!&#8217;/'?&#8217; characters in a character&#8217;s speech to the number of words, lines or complete sentences spoken by the character &#8211; or did you do something else entirely?  </p>
<p>Many thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

